Talmud zu Bava Batra 3:1

חֶזְקַת הַבָּתִּים וְהַבּוֹרוֹת וְהַשִּׁיחִין וְהַמְּעָרוֹת וְהַשּׁוֹבָכוֹת וְהַמֶּרְחֲצָאוֹת וּבֵית הַבַּדִּין וּבֵית הַשְּׁלָחִין וְהָעֲבָדִים וְכָל שֶׁהוּא עוֹשֶׂה פֵרוֹת תָּדִיר, חֶזְקָתָן שָׁלֹשׁ שָׁנִים מִיּוֹם לְיוֹם. שְׂדֵה הַבַּעַל, חֶזְקָתָהּ שָׁלֹשׁ שָׁנִים, וְאֵינָהּ מִיּוֹם לְיוֹם, רַבִּי יִשְׁמָעֵאל אוֹמֵר, שְׁלֹשָׁה חֳדָשִׁים בָּרִאשׁוֹנָה וּשְׁלֹשָׁה בָּאַחֲרוֹנָה וּשְׁנֵים עָשָׂר חֹדֶשׁ בָאֶמְצַע, הֲרֵי שְׁמֹנָה עָשָׂר חֹדֶשׁ. רַבִּי עֲקִיבָא אוֹמֵר, חֹדֶשׁ בָּרִאשׁוֹנָה וְחֹדֶשׁ בָּאַחֲרוֹנָה וּשְׁנֵים עָשָׂר חֹדֶשׁ בָּאֶמְצַע, הֲרֵי אַרְבָּעָה עָשָׂר חֹדֶשׁ. אָמַר רַבִּי יִשְׁמָעֵאל, בַּמֶּה דְבָרִים אֲמוּרִים, בִּשְׂדֵה לָבָן. אֲבָל בִּשְׂדֵה אִילָן, כָּנַס אֶת תְּבוּאָתוֹ, מָסַק אֶת זֵיתָיו, כָּנַס אֶת קֵיצוֹ, הֲרֵי אֵלּוּ שָׁלֹשׁ שָׁנִים:

Die Chazakah (Besitzzeit, die als Eigentumsnachweis angesehen wird) für Häuser, Boroth, Shichin und Ma'aroth (siehe 2: 1), Taubenschläge, Badehäuser, eine Olivenpresse, ein bewässertes Feld, Knechte und alle Dinge, die ständig Früchte produzieren —Ihre Chazaka beträgt drei Jahre, von Tag zu Tag. [Wenn jemand seine Kaufrechnung verloren hat und Zeugen mitgebracht hat, dass er in jedem der in unserer Mischna angeführten Fälle im Besitz war, wird angenommen, dass er der Käufer ist, und ihm wird nicht gesagt: "Bringen Sie Ihre Kaufvertrag. " Bis zu drei Jahre kümmert man sich um seine Kaufrechnung, aber nicht länger. Und dem Antragsteller wird gesagt: Wenn Sie es ihm nicht verkauft hätten, hätten Sie vor zwei (Zeugen) protestieren sollen: "Wisse, dass dieser Mann mein Land im Diebstahl" frisst "", und die Angelegenheit wäre ihm zu Ohren gekommen. und er wäre mit seiner Kaufrechnung aufmerksam gewesen. Für "Ihr Freund hat einen Freund, und der Freund Ihres Freundes hat einen Freund." Und da Sie nicht protestiert haben, ist es Ihr Verlust. ("ein bewässertes Feld" :) Da es zum Zwecke der Bewässerung ständig überwacht wird, ist es ständig produktiv. Und die Chazaka von etwas, das ständig produktiv ist, beträgt drei Jahre von Tag zu Tag. ("Knechte" :) Und obwohl wir regieren: "Godroth (Schafe, wie in Numeri 32:16: 'gidroth tzon' (dh Schafställe) haben keine Chazaka", und das gilt auch für alle Lebewesen—Es ist eine unmittelbare Chazaka, die sie nicht haben. Das heißt, wenn bekannt war, dass die Schafe oder der Knecht einem Mann gehörten und sie das Haus eines anderen betraten und der zweite behauptete, er habe sie gekauft und sei im Besitz von ihnen, ist dies keine Chazaka, denn sie sind daran gewöhnt von Haus zu Haus gehen. Aber wenn er drei Jahre lang einen Schuldner hielt, ist dies eine Chazaka, und er braucht keinen Kaufvertrag.] Die Chazaka eines regengespeisten Feldes [das nur einmal im Jahr produktiv ist] beträgt drei Jahre, [ohne "von Tag für Tag. "] R. Yishmael sagt: Drei Monate im ersten (Jahr), drei Monate im letzten und zwölf Monate in der Mitte—achtzehn Monate. [Denn es gibt Produkte, die in drei Monaten wachsen, wie Gerste, Hafer und Linsen— damit man in achtzehn Monaten drei Ernten essen kann.] R. Akiva sagt: Ein Monat im ersten, ein Monat im letzten und zwölf Monate in der Mitte —vierzehn Monate. [Einige Dinge wachsen in dreißig Tagen, wie junger Mais und Gemüse. Wenn er also vierzehn Monate davon gegessen hat, ist es eine Chazaka.] R. Yishmael sagte: [(R. Yishmael ist der Ansicht, dass das Essen von jungem Mais und Gemüse keine Chazaka begründet, sondern nur das Essen von echtem Getreide und Obst .)] Wann ist das so? [dass achtzehn Monate für ein regengespeistes Feld benötigt werden?] Mit einem Getreidefeld, [dessen Produkte alle in einem Zeitraum gepflückt werden, weshalb drei Jahre erforderlich sind.]; aber mit einem Baumfeld, [dessen Früchte in verschiedenen Perioden gepflückt werden: Trauben in einer Periode; Oliven in einem anderen; und Feigen in einem anderen], wenn er in seinen Produkten [Traubenwein] sammelte, seine Oliven erntete und in seinen Feigen sammelte [dh wenn er sie erntete, trocknete und in sein Haus brachte], ist dies [ eine Chazaka, als wären es drei Jahre. [Die Halacha stimmt weder mit R. Akiva noch mit R. Yishmael überein.]

Jerusalem Talmud Peah

Rebbi Zeïra asked before Rebbi Yasa: If he intended to let them acquire from the boundary strip¹⁶Every field is surrounded by a strip, mostly of grass, usually slightly elevated over the cultivated area. On this strip one may walk between fields and also deposit agricultural implements. Rebbi Zeïra asks what is the rule if some grain grew on the boundary strip and the owner of the field wants to fulfill his duty by abandoning this grain which cannot usually be harvested. Rebbi Yasa (Rebbi Assi in the Babli) avoided answering, perhaps because he did not know the answer.
There is a similar problem in Baba Batra, dealing with real estate left by a convert to Judaism who failed to start a Jewish family. Since by conversion the convert severed his ties to his former family, in the absence of a will his property becomes ownerless at his death and can be acquired by actual possession. Then the question is whether two adjacent fields can be acquired if one performs an act of possession (such as weeding) on one of them. In the Yerushalmi (Baba Batra 3:1, fol. 13d), R. Yasa states in the name of R. Joḥanan that if one weeded on one of two adjacent fields with the intention of thereby acquiring both fields but did not have the explicit intent to acquire the boundary strip also, he acquired only the field he weeded but no more. Then it is reported that R. Zeïra asked R. Yasa about somebody working on the boundary strip only (whether he would acquire both fields), and R. Yasa avoided answering. In the Babli (Baba Batra 55a), R. Assi states in the name of R. Joḥanan that boundary strip and ḥaẓab are dividers in respect to the property of a convert but not for peah whereas Ravin (Rebbi Abun) declares in the name of R. Joḥanan that it is not a divider for peah. For the Yerushalmi, R. Assi himself was not sure whether R. Joḥanan followed the opinion ascribed to himself in the Babli, or that ascribed to R. Abun.? He avoided answering him. The opinions of Rebbi Yasa are contradictory since we have stated there (Mishnah 3:2): “The sages agree with Rebbi Aqiba about someone who sowed dill or mustard in three places¹⁷The Mishnah deals with someone who spot-harvests his field, cutting at separate places and letting the rest grow for an extended period of time. Rebbi Aqiba requires that each time and at each place peah be given, but the sages require only one peah for the whole field, except for (expensive) spices..” (The Mishnah means: dill in three places or mustard in three places.) Samuel said, because the first of them does not wait for the last¹⁸Obviously, one plot is harvested at one time; otherwise, there would be no obligation for peah. Samuel asserts that spice plants can be harvested at greatly varying times.. Rebbi Yasa in the name of Rebbi Joḥanan: Because they are usually sown in separate beds¹⁹Spices are never grown in large fields since they belong to intensive agriculture.. And here he says so²⁰In fact, he refuses to say what he should say, viz., that the boundary strip is never sown intentionally and therefore cannot be counted as peah.? It is obvious for him that it separates²¹This is the opinion ascribed to R. Abun in the Babli.. What he could not decide is whether it does become sanctified as peah or maybe it does not become sanctified²²Since peah is exempt from terumah and tithes, the status of the grain growing on the boundary strip remains in limbo.! Rebbi Hoshaiah stated: If someone gave peah from one field for another one, it does not acquire holiness. One understands that this means even the boundary strip²³Again supporting the opinion ascribed to R. Abun in the Babli. (In the Babli, Rabin is reputed to give the correct interpretations of sentences of R. Joḥanan.).

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Bava Metzia

MISHNAH: One who contracts with another for a field¹⁷The nature of the field was not specified in the lease., if it is an irrigated field or an orchard and the source dried up or the orchard was cut down, he¹⁸The tenant. This Mishnah does not apply to sharecroppers. may not deduct from his leasing fee. If he said, this irrigated field or this orchard shall be leased to me¹⁹The nature of the field was specified in the lease. and the source dried up or the orchard was cut down, he may deduct from his leasing fee.

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Sheviit

MISHNAH: One fertilizes and hoes in melon and gourd fields until the New Year; the same applies to irrigated fields. One trims, removes¹²The leaves, as explained in the Halakhah. According to Maimonides, R. Simeon permits this particular activity also in the Sabbatical year. However, it seems that R. Simeon permits only the removal of leaves from bunches of grapes if otherwise the grapes would rot; see the Halakhah., dusts, and smokes until the New Year. Rebbi Simeon said, one may even remove a leaf from a bunch in the Sabbatical year.
One may remove stones²⁵From his field. until the New Year. One cuts²⁶Really “nibbles”, in an unsystematic way. “Pruning” means eliminating unwanted new shoots, “shaping” means eliminating dead wood., prunes, and shapes until the New Year. Rebbi Joshua says, like the pruning and shaping of the fifth year²⁷When there are no time limits on any agricultural work., so is that of the sixth. Rebbi Simeon says, any time that I may work the tree I may shape it.

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Sheviit

MISHNAH: Sterile onions and Egyptian beans from which water was withheld thirty days before the New Year are tithed for the past [year] and may be kept in the Sabbatical year⁵⁸They may be treated as private property of the farmer and be harvested during the Sabbatical year. If tithes are given for this crop from another place, it must be from produce of the preceding year.; otherwise they are forbidden in the Sabbatical year⁵⁹Forbidden to be harvested and stored as seeds but permitted to be taken by everybody. and are tithed for the coming year. For those from a ba‘al field⁹⁴An unirrigated field that must be watered by hand if used for vegetables. The term seems to be taken from pagan neighbors since Ba‘al is the Semitic rain god, equivalent of the Greek Zeus. The Tosephta (Note 83) makes it explicit that the first rule speaks of fields irrigated by a permanent installation., if one withheld water for two periods⁸³Tosephta 2:4 is practically identical with Mishnah 9, except that in the case of ba‘al fields, the Tosephta states that for the field to qualify as seed field, one must withhold two (or three) מריעות, instead of עונות in the Mishnah. The Tosephta is partially quoted in Ma‘serot 4:5 (fol. 51b), where the reading is מודייות [two] modii.
R. Abraham ben David (Ma‘aser Šeni 1:10) deduces from the Mishnah that מוריות, מריעות are instances of irrigation; R. S. Lieberman reads the words as derived from מרביעות “fertilizations,” but it might be better to take the word from מרויות “waterings”. בעל fields of produce other than grains, while not irrigated permanently, are watered occasionally (Mishnah 9).
Maimonides, followed by the commentators of his Code and J. Levy, translates מורביות (or מרביות in the Rome ms.) as “trimmings”; that meaning is found in the Babli (Sukkah 45a, Tamid29a). R. Abraham ben David wonders why Maimonides in his Code follows an unclear Tosephta instead of a clear Mishnah., the words of Rebbi Meïr, but the Sages say three.

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Ganzes Kapitel Nächster Vers